There is no verified, published net worth figure for the "Artukovich family" in any major financial database as of May 2026. What you will find instead are two very different groups of people sharing that surname: a U.S.-based family construction dynasty (Vido Artukovich & Son, Inc.) active in California since at least 1952, and a historically prominent Croatian political figure, Andrija Artuković, whose name surfaces constantly in war-crimes and legal contexts. Neither has a traceable balance-sheet net worth in the sources typically used by wealth-tracking sites. That does not mean the wealth picture is a blank, it means you need to work from corporate records, property filings, and contracting data rather than trusting any headline number you find on a net-worth aggregator site.
Artukovich Family Net Worth: How to Verify Claims Step by Step
Who the Artukovich family actually is
The most traceable contemporary "Artukovich family" in U.S. records is built around a construction business. Vido Artukovich emigrated and founded the original firm, which eventually became Vido Artukovich & Son, Inc., a California-based underground construction contractor. The company has been a member of AGC California since 1952, which tells you this is a decades-long, institutionally recognized operation. By the time of the most recent corporate filings, three family members run it: Anthony Artukovich and his sons Vido and Mark. The California Secretary of State registry shows a related entity called Vidmar, Inc. (document number 1412307, formed July 10, 1987), with Anthony V. Artukovich listed as Secretary and Director, and Vido Artukovich as Director, CEO, and CFO. A federal SBA solicitation entry also ties "Anthony Artukovich" to the joint venture "Vido Artukovich & Son Inc / Vidmar Inc JV," confirming the business has a federal contracting footprint you can pull and verify.
The other name you will almost certainly hit in your search is Andrija Artuković (note the accent on the c), a Croatian lawyer and senior Ustaše official during WWII who served as Minister of Internal Affairs and Minister of Justice in the Independent State of Croatia. He was born in 1899, fled to the U.S. after the war, was later extradited, stood trial in Zagreb in 1986, and died in a Yugoslav prison hospital on January 16, 1988. His name appears in a U.S. Supreme Court case (Karadzole v. Artukovic, 355 U.S. 393) and in extensive international legal records. He is a historical figure, not a wealth subject. Because Andrija Artuković is a historical figure rather than a living business owner, there is no reliable, verified basis for any claim about Vasyl Ivanchuk net worth. Any "net worth" associated with his name online is either invented or misattributed.
Why net worth estimates vary so much (and which sources to trust)
Net-worth aggregator sites rarely disclose their methodology, and for privately held families like the construction Artukoviches, they are almost always guessing. The core problem is that privately held corporations do not file public earnings reports. Wealth has to be inferred from revenue estimates, comparable industry margins, officer compensation proxies, real estate ownership, and asset registry records. Different estimators use different assumptions, different time periods, and different currency baselines, which is why you can see figures that differ by orders of magnitude on different sites. For a family whose wealth is held through closely held corporations (Vido Artukovich & Son and Vidmar, Inc.) rather than publicly traded shares, there is no audited number to anchor any estimate. The family itself has described an internal asset-split process after relatives divided the business, which means the equity picture is fragmented across multiple entities and likely some estate records.
The sources worth trusting for this family are: California Secretary of State corporate filings (which confirm officers, registered agents, and formation dates), federal contracting databases (which can show contract awards and values over time), AGC California membership records (which confirm industry standing), and investigative journalism that cites primary documents. Any site that gives you a clean dollar figure without linking to one of those underlying sources is almost certainly modeling or fabricating.
A practical research checklist for today
- Confirm which Artukovich you mean: search "Artukovich" plus "California" or "construction" to isolate the business family from historical figures.
- Pull the California Secretary of State record for Vidmar, Inc. (document number 1412307) and Vido Artukovich & Son, Inc. to see current officers, registered agents, and any status changes.
- Search the SAM.gov and USASpending.gov federal contracting databases for "Vido Artukovich & Son" and the joint venture "Vido Artukovich & Son Inc / Vidmar Inc JV" to find awarded contract values over time.
- Run the officers (Anthony V. Artukovich, Vido Artukovich, Mark Artukovich) through your state and county property records (California county assessor portals) to identify real estate holdings.
- Check AGC California's member directory for any supplementary business details or affiliated entities.
- Search PACER (U.S. federal court records) and California Superior Court records for the family name to surface any litigation that might reference asset values or business disputes.
- Run a Cal-OSHA case search for "Vido Artukovich & Son" (a 1983 case is already on record) to find additional operational history that may point to business scale.
- Cross-reference any "net worth" figure you find online against at least one of the above primary sources before accepting it.
Where the family's wealth likely comes from
Construction contracts and business equity
The primary wealth pathway is the construction business itself. Vido Artukovich & Son, Inc. has operated continuously since at least 1952 and holds federal contracting relationships through the Vidmar joint venture. In underground and heavy civil construction in California, long-tenured family contractors of this scale typically accumulate wealth through retained earnings, equipment assets, and equity in the operating entity rather than through salary or dividends that would show up in public records. The fact that the Artukoviches split business assets at one point "by equal piles and drawing straws" (as the company's own history describes) is a signal that the firm's value was real and substantial enough to require a formal division process, even if no dollar figure was disclosed.
Real estate and equipment holdings
Construction families in California routinely hold significant wealth in commercial real estate (yards, staging areas, office properties) and in heavy equipment fleets. Neither of these asset classes requires public disclosure, but both show up in county assessor records and equipment lien filings. These are the most productive records to pull if you want to build an evidence-based asset picture.
Federal contracting revenue
The SBA solicitation entry for the Vido Artukovich & Son / Vidmar Inc. JV is the clearest public financial signal available. Federal contracts are public record. If you search USASpending.gov for awarded contracts tied to this entity, you will find the dollar values of specific projects, which you can use to infer revenue ranges. That is not the same as net worth, but it is the closest thing to a verified financial data point available today.
No documented political or oligarch-linked wealth pathway
Unlike many profiles covered on this site, the construction Artukovich family does not have a documented connection to post-Soviet financial networks, oligarch structures, or political wealth pathways. The historical Andrija Artuković connection is entirely separate and involves a WWII-era political figure with no traceable personal asset record. If your search was prompted by interest in Eastern European political or oligarch wealth, this family is almost certainly not what you are looking for. Profiles of figures like Ilya Kovalchuk or Vyacheslav Taran involve the kind of post-Soviet financial architecture this site typically covers; the Artukovich name in that context does not appear in any verified record found in this research. If you meant Ilya Varlamov specifically, you can cross-check his public track record and financial reporting to evaluate any claims about his net worth Ilya Kovalchuk or Vyacheslav Taran. If you are seeing net worth claims for Vyacheslav Taran, check whether they are tied to verifiable business records or just reposted speculation. Estimates of Ilya Kovalchuk net worth are often based on post-Soviet financial holdings and can be difficult to verify from primary sources.
How to interpret any net worth range you find
Because no authoritative net-worth computation exists for this family, any range you encounter has to be treated as a model estimate rather than a verified figure. If you end up comparing this kind of uncertainty with vassily ivanchuk net worth, remember that most “clean” numbers without underlying sources are still just modeled or unverified. The honest way to frame it: based on the available evidence (long-tenured California construction contractor, federal joint-venture contracting history, closely held corporate structure, and multi-generational family ownership), a reasonable inference is that the family's combined business and real estate holdings place them in a range typical for regional construction contractors of similar tenure and scale. In California's underground construction sector, that could mean anywhere from low-single-digit millions to mid-double-digit millions in total equity, but that is an inference from industry comparables, not a documented figure. Until corporate filings, property records, or investigative reporting surfaces specific asset values, any tighter estimate would be fabricated.
| Evidence Type | What It Tells You | What It Does Not Tell You |
|---|---|---|
| California Secretary of State filings (Vidmar, Inc.) | Officers, structure, formation date, legal status | Revenue, profits, or equity value |
| Federal contracting records (SBA/USASpending.gov) | Contract award amounts and project history | Net margins or retained earnings |
| AGC California membership (since 1952) | Long-standing industry presence and scale | Current asset values |
| County property records | Real estate holdings and assessed values | Equipment, cash, or investment accounts |
| Cal-OSHA case records | Operational history and business scale signals | Financial performance or net worth |
Where to verify with actual records
- California Secretary of State Business Search (bizfile.sos.ca.gov): search Vidmar, Inc. by document number 1412307 and Vido Artukovich & Son, Inc. by name
- SAM.gov: search registered entities for the JV name to confirm federal contractor status and NAICS classification
- USASpending.gov: filter by recipient name for awarded contract dollar amounts
- California county assessor portals (Los Angeles or relevant county): search owner names for real property records
- PACER (pacer.gov): search the Artukovich name for any federal court filings that may reference asset values
- California Superior Court case search: useful for any civil or probate records tied to estate or business disputes
- AGC California member directory (agc-ca.org): confirm current membership and any listed affiliates
Spelling variants and identity mix-ups to watch for
The surname appears in multiple spellings across different record systems: Artukovich, Artuković, Artukovic, and Artukowitch. The construction family consistently uses "Artukovich" in U.S. filings. The historical Croatian figure is almost always rendered as "Artuković" in academic and legal sources, and as "Artukovic" in older U.S. court documents (the Supreme Court case caption uses that spelling). If you are searching and getting results about WWII war crimes, extradition hearings, or Yugoslav tribunals, you have landed on Andrija Artuković's record set, which has no connection to the construction family and no net-worth relevance.
A further identity issue: the name "Mark Artukovich" appears in both an obituary tied to the construction business and in general family references. If you encounter this name in your research, verify it against the business context (Vido Artukovich & Son) before assuming you have found a separate wealth subject. The company's own industry recognition records (including Golden Beavers Awards coverage) name Vido Artukovich, Mark Artukovich, and Anthony Artukovich in a consistent construction-business context, which is the clearest disambiguation anchor available.
Next steps after you have identified the right person
Once you have confirmed you are looking at the construction family and not a historical or misidentified figure, the practical next steps are: pull the California corporate filings to establish the current ownership structure, run the federal contracting history to get revenue-proxy data, and search county property records to identify real estate assets. From those three sources you can build a bottom-up asset estimate that is grounded in actual evidence rather than aggregator speculation. As new filings appear (annual statement renewals, any UCC lien filings, or new federal contract awards), update your estimate accordingly. If investigative journalism or a court filing ever surfaces a specific asset valuation, that should immediately anchor and replace any model-based range. Until then, treat any specific dollar figure for the Artukovich family net worth as an informed estimate, not a confirmed fact. If you are specifically trying to estimate Ivanchuk net worth, make sure you are not mixing up different people with similar name patterns and sources Artukovich family net worth.
FAQ
How can I tell if a “Artukovich family net worth” claim is actually about the California construction business?
Check whether the claim names specific U.S. entities or people tied to the contractor (for example Vido Artukovich & Son, Inc. or Vidmar, Inc., and officers like Anthony Artukovich). If the page only uses a surname and then jumps to unrelated political or WWII content, it is almost certainly misattributed.
Do I need to worry about the accent in Artuković versus Artukovich when verifying net-worth claims?
Yes. Use both spellings when searching, but treat them as different identity buckets. If results involve extradition, trials, or WWII ministry roles, that is the historical figure track. If results involve California corporate filings, AGC membership, or federal contracting, that is the construction-family track.
Why do net-worth aggregator sites give wildly different numbers for the same Artukovich surname?
Because privately held firms usually do not disclose audited asset and equity statements publicly. Estimators typically mix assumptions about margins, revenue-to-equity conversion, officer compensation proxies, and real-estate values, then apply different time windows. That makes the numbers more model output than verification.
What is the closest “verified” financial signal I can use if there is no net-worth statement?
Use federal contracting awards tied to the U.S. joint venture (Vido Artukovich & Son Inc / Vidmar Inc JV) as a revenue proxy. It still is not net worth, but contract amounts plus project frequency can help you build a grounded revenue range before attempting an equity or asset inference.
Can I estimate net worth by looking only at corporate filings?
Partly, but not completely. California filings help confirm who is in charge and which entities exist, but they generally do not provide full balance sheets for private firms. You still need at least one additional evidence layer (property records for assets, UCC filings for secured obligations, or contract history for revenue direction).
How do I avoid mixing the construction family with the historical Andrija Artuković records?
If the information mentions legal captions, extradition, prison death dates, or WWII-era ministry posts, assume you are in the historical figure bucket. A correct construction-family search should pull toward corporate records, county property, and contracting entries rather than war-crimes proceedings.
What should I look for in county property records to build an evidence-based asset picture?
Start by identifying properties held in the names of the company or named principals, then track acquisition dates, assessed values, and any recorded liens. Commercial real estate and staging yard style assets are common hidden wealth channels for contractors, and assessor records can show whether assets are concentrated or widely spread across entities.
How can UCC lien filings or other debt indicators change an estimated net worth range?
If there are recent UCC filings tied to the operating entities, they can indicate the amount of secured obligations that reduce usable equity. Two families can have similar property values, but the one with higher secured debt will have lower net worth, so you should incorporate liabilities rather than only assets.
What are common mistakes when searching for “Mark Artukovich” in this context?
Do not assume every Mark Artukovich result belongs to the contractor. Confirm the context (obituary wording, company references, industry award coverage, or explicit links to Vido Artukovich & Son). If the result lacks the business context, it may be a different person with the same surname.
If I see a “net worth” figure that cites a source, is that automatically trustworthy?
Not necessarily. Verify whether the cited source is a primary document you can inspect (corporate filings, specific contract award records, property records), or whether it is another secondary post. A number presented without a trail back to measurable documents should be treated as an unverified model.
Should I use a single net-worth number as my final conclusion, or a range?
Use a range until you can anchor it to documented assets and obligations. For closely held construction businesses, the best practice is to build a bottom-up estimate from property holdings plus contract-revenue proxies, then adjust for secured debt. A single “clean” dollar figure is usually an unsupported shortcut.
Citations
No widely verifiable, current “net worth” record was found for any “Artukovich family” in major investigative/financial databases; the most prominent Artukovich figures in traceable public records are historical war-crimes subjects and a separate U.S. construction family with contracts/business registrations rather than published balance-sheet wealth disclosures.
The Artukovich construction firm lineage is described by the company itself: it states Vido Artukovich founded the business (after emigration in 1912), later became “Vido Artukovich & Son, Inc.,” and that “Today three Artukovich’s run the company; Anthony and his progeny Vido and Mark,” with Mark and Vido running estimating/administration vs. field operations (and describes a 1987 partnership involving Vidmar Inc. with a joint-venture relationship).
https://www.artukovich.com/history
A U.S. government contracting database entry ties the name “Anthony Artukovich” to “Vido Artukovich & Son Inc / Vidmar Inc JV” with contact details and business classification context (showing this is a real business record suitable for further beneficial-owner/corporate-record linkage).
https://subnet.sba.gov/client/dsp_solicitation_business_details_2.cfm?IMBUSSEQNMB=5407
The page claims the company “Vidmar, Inc.” is an active California corporation (document number 1412307; formed July 10, 1987) and lists officers/directors/roles including Anthony V Artukovich (Secretary/Director), Vido Artukovich (Director), and also identifies Vido Artukovich as CFO and CEO; it explicitly states the data was extracted from the California Secretary of State registry (as of 7/27/2025).
https://www.bizprofile.net/ca/south-el-monte/vidmar-inc
The Artukovich companies are presented as a long-running, family-owned construction business in the U.S., providing an alternative interpretation of “Artukovich family” online that is different from the historical Croatia war-crimes figure(s).
https://www.artukovich.com/
The surname “Artuković” is commonly linked online (in reputable reference contexts) to multiple individuals; Wikipedia’s “Artuković” page lists Andrija Artuković as the prominent historical figure (1899–1988), indicating that “Artukovich family” could be a conflation of different people unless names and contexts are disambiguated.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artukovi%C4%87
Andrija Artuković is documented as a Croatian lawyer/politician and senior Ustaše figure who served as Minister of Internal Affairs and Minister of Justice in the Independent State of Croatia during WWII; his death is listed as 16 January 1988, and the page indicates he escaped to the U.S. after WWII and was later extradited (context that often triggers online “family” references, but does not provide net worth).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrija_Artukovi%C4%87
Contemporaneous reporting documents that Andrija Artuković stood trial in Zagreb in 1986 for WWII-related crimes (confirming traceable legal-record context rather than wealth disclosures).
https://elpais.com/diario/1986/04/18/internacional/514159209_850215.html
JTA’s archival piece reports that Andrija Artuković died in a Yugoslav prison hospital in Zagreb (again establishing legal-historical record context rather than any net-worth figure).
https://www.jta.org/archive/war-criminal-andrija-artukovic-dies-in-yugoslav-prison-hospital
A U.S. Supreme Court case caption “ARTUKOVIC” exists (Karadzole v. Artukovic, 355 U.S. 393), demonstrating that Artukovic/Artuković name variants appear in official U.S. legal records even when “net worth” sites can be unreliable or conflated.
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/355/393/
An obituary record ties “Mark Artukovich” to the family construction business “Vido Artukovich & Son” and provides a U.S.-context individual name suitable for mapping “Artukovich family” in wealth pathway research (even though obituaries rarely quantify net worth).
https://www.legacy.com/us/obituaries/latimes/name/mark-artukovich-obituary?id=6628341
Industry coverage identifies people associated with the firm (including “Vido Artukovich (Vidmar)” and also “Mark Artukovich” and “Anthony Artukovich”), supporting the idea that the contemporary “Artukovich family” in U.S. online results refers to business leaders in construction rather than WWII-era political figures.
https://undergroundinfrastructure.com/magazine/2010/april-2010-vol-65-no-4/business/golden-beavers-awards-presented
The same bizprofile source states officers include Vido Artukovich as registered agent and CEO/CFO, plus Anthony V Artukovich as secretary/director; this is directly useful for corporate-record bounding of any wealth “pathway” through equity/compensation, even though it is not a net-worth valuation.
https://www.bizprofile.net/ca/south-el-monte/vidmar-inc
The company history page states the firm’s division of equipment/assets “by equal piles and drawing straws” after relatives split (describing internal asset transfer mechanics), which can explain why family-wealth records are likely to be held through closely-held corporations rather than public trades.
https://www.artukovich.com/history
Cal-OSHA case digest exists for “Vido Artukovich & Son, Inc.” (published Jan 1, 1983), indicating the firm appears in regulatory/administrative record systems that can be used to trace operations/risks, though not wealth. (This is an example of “traceable records” available beyond net-worth sites.)
https://www.cal-osha.com/case/15480r-vido-artukovich-amp-son-inc/
AGC California lists “Vido Artukovich & Son, Inc.” with a specific address and indicates “Member Since: 1952,” providing corroboration that the business has long-standing presence (useful for wealth pathway inference via long-duration revenue and assets, but still not a net-worth amount).
https://web.agc-ca.org/23491-Water%2C-Sewer-and-Pipeline-Construction/Vido-Artukovich-Son%2C-Inc-16718
The solicitation entry provides a structured business listing that can be cross-checked against federal contracting history and likely corporate records (e.g., state incorporation, beneficial ownership, officer identities), which is the kind of evidence needed to validate or rule out net-worth claims.
https://subnet.sba.gov/client/dsp_solicitation_business_details_2.cfm?IMBUSSEQNMB=5407
In this initial scan, no authoritative, traceable net-worth computation methodology from top-tier investigative sources was found specifically for “Artukovich family”; therefore, any “net worth” range today would have to be constructed from corporate holdings/estate/property records rather than assumed from net-worth estimate sites.
Estimate Vyacheslav Taran net worth: how figures are calculated, sources used, and why values may differ.
Estimated Vassily Ivanchuk net worth with income breakdown, source range, and how to verify prize records.
Ilya Kovalchuk net worth 2026 range explained: how estimates are calculated, key income sources, and why figures differ.